Down to physics

Particle physics is “wrong”

I can no longer find anyone in this world who believes that particle physics is wrong , so I stand alone on this island of opinion. Let's get down to physics.

I don’t care.

For me “reality” is simply this.

A vortex created out of a disturbance of “nothing”.

creation

And no...   it is true...  I offer no explanation or theory about what is being disturbed, or what is disturbing it.

You might consider this to be the “flaw in my logic” , which gives you an easy path to reject all of this.   But from my perception , concluding that you need to accept anything as true , as a means to get to the truth, is the inherent insanity of all logic. It’s very “unscientific” of you to start out of the fact that anything has to be true, but I’ve explained this , because that is where all the modern day religious implementations of the truth take their “wrong” turn... 

which everyone else calls “RIGHT!”.

In the picture above you see a plane disturbing a colored cloud of smoke by passing “through” it. That is the very simple “nature” of what we call “matter”.   And the entire “standard model” of “particle physics” madness that follows out of the fact that you cannot let go of the idea that “something” has to “exist”. A madness born out of the inability to perceive “nothing”.

Things “exist” only by relation to something else in the upper layers, and the lower layers.

Things “exist” because it is something orbiting another thing , and together they orbit another, and another and another...  

And even math , which is nothing more then a mind “counting things” has given us proof of this , which is the first thing I will dive in shortly.

Yes...  yes...  i know...   there are many paths for you to follow that will lead to rejection of this entire chapter and these “crazy ideas”.   But since the entire community of millions upon millions of theoretical physicists and mathematicians are calling each other insane for thousands of years now...   with a kazillion of endlessly debated theorems and experiments...I don’t mind jumping into that field too.    It’s just a fun little game really.

Just like all those other mathematicians I reject mine and other’s opinions and construct a theory of my own that I will reject again at some other point in time and space.

The only difference for me is that while I do consider your method to be insane...   I do not consider you to be wrong, or you to be insane.  That would not be virtuous. That would not be love. And I simply love it all.

There is simply a simple logical fallacy in the religious dogma you accept, that anything has to be considered “real” before you can construct a theory.  I have started from nothing , and I end up with nothing, so my circle is complete.  And since I have come to the conclusion that everything is just “something” orbiting “something else” , and nothing exists except the relationships between disturbances , my circle is complete and I can perform my duty...  which is orbiting my why.

All is well in my universe...   how about yours?

I simply ignore the fact that you think I am wrong, but that doesn’t mean I have to agree with you , and it also doesn’t mean you have to agree with me.

I just love.

Math

There are two simple and elegantly beautiful formulas, in enormous complexity in all directions that seem to apply to almost everything we can observe.

To me this means they come really close to having a high value of BBB-ness. (but are still limited to the immense constrictive property of “counting things”.)

1.      Einstein’s E=MC² Which was actually noted down by himself in his original paper as M = E/C². He wasn’t describing energy as a result of mass...   he was describing mass as a result of energy/speed.

2.      Mandelbrott’s description of infinity The Mandelbrot set is the set of values of c in the complex plane for which the orbit of the critical point z = 0 under iteration of the quadratic map  remains bounded. He is describing how something can remain in orbit while infinitely complex. It all just depends on scale.

Both have come to these conclusions by nothing else then observing “reality” , and don’t really have anything to start with.  And it is the combination of both that to me prove that there is no actual matter.  Just infinitely smaller, and infinitely larger disturbances.

In the direction “down” everything just breaks up into smaller disturbances caused by bigger disturbances.

In the direction “up” everything can attain “synchronization” causing it to be able to interact (form a relation) with another “synchronized” disturbance on a relative scale.

There are “bridges” in these scales which are the simple result of adding up ...  or simply counting, and they become evident in the mapping out of the Mandelbrot set.

bridges

As you can see in the scale mapping on the top left of that graph... “complexity” happens in a pattern of scale.

First it takes a long “time” for 1 to become 2 , then it takes a shorter time for those “2” to break up into 2 separate 2’s , and then things suddenly become very complex in very complex way , ever faster and faster.  

But if you keep zooming into that “scale” even the scale of the scales becomes a fractal patterns where there are again periods of “slow growing complexity”. 

You end up with a 1 again at some point , that takes a long time to split into 2...  which takes a shorter time to split into 2 separate 2’s and so the “scale of scale” is repeating.

So my theory is simply this...  

We are at a certain “scale” of a disturbance , and in both direction UP and DOWN there are certain “periods” where there is a sudden “leap” of simplicity again that we cannot cross because the difference in scale is suddenly too vast. 

In the direction “UP” we enter that unbridgeable gap of “reality’s” scale on the scale of Galaxies. The distance between galaxies is a kazzilionth times kazzilionth the size of a galaxy and therefor unbridgeable.    Beyond the scale of a galaxy...   there is no conceivable way to become “big” enough in synchronization to be able to interact and so the concept of “relationship” is broken between galaxies.

But at the same time this also means that it is perfectly possible that all the different galaxies can be in synchronization on a much larger scale simply because of this.    All the observable galaxies are perhaps forming a single “particle” for existence on a different scale of size...    with their own relative scale of “Time”. And why wouldn’t it be possible that the infinitely large is the thing that forms the infinitely small too.  Why wouldn’t that be a circle, while everything in the circle is also a circle.

Just the same as there is no real conceivable relationship between solar systems that form a galaxy. 

The distance between solar systems is a kazzilionth times kazzilionth times more then the size of a single solar system , and the same pattern repeats there again. There is no conceivable way to cross over into another solar system within any timeframe that makes sense to this scale of “disturbance”.  Put your hyperspace and “folding space” theories in a pipe and smoke it...  where is your definition of a “solid truth” that you can observe that even comes close to that one?  

Isn’t it incredibly peculiar we are all suddenly perfectly capable to believe in this religion because it suits us, yet we have no clue where and how we could base this on...  simply because it is the only way we can hold on to the fact that “matter” is actually real?  Simply because you cannot let go of the fact that you can “touch” things?  

But then what “are” things you say? 

Well...  let’s apply the same pattern to the infinitely small?

Just as everything on larger scales (and larger scales are nothing more then larger groups of “synchronized” smaller disturbances) become “slower”... so does everything that is smaller, automatically become “faster”.

So what is an atom you say...  which we can clearly observe is real?

Well...   it is a small disturbance , born out a bigger disturbance...  but it is now so small and so fast that it seems like it’s everywhere at the same time, in it’s orbit around something else in a 3 dimensional space.

And the space between atoms is a kazillionth times kazzilionth times more then the size of an atom.

Just like solar systems , just like galaxies...

Where does this logic lead us too?

Well...  that every single “Atom” is a “universe” , and that every “universe” is an “atom”...  and this can be infinitely repeated in both directions...   just like the Mandelbrot set shows...  because it is truly infinite , and it constantly repeats itself.

But that tiny little universe that is an atom, is so small...  which means that within it’s own scale of time is spinning at a comparable to our, but in our scale so fast , that it just looks like solid to our synchronized scale of disturbance.

But it has bridges of scale.

And everything that orbits something else has it’s own definition of it’s own relative time.

Yes it is true that light cannot travel faster then the speed of light...  but that’s only true at our scale.It is only true between the two bridges of our scale...    Once you cross a bridge of scale...  you come into a new sub-divided scale with it’s “own speed of light” which is a constant for a certain space between the bridges.This is the explanation why the laws of special relativity don’t hold up anymore at subatomic scales. One of the clearest examples of this is that according to the math , an electron has to be spinning at a speed faster than light.  But it’s only faster then our light in our scale.  In the time-scale of that electron it’s going just as fast as light is here.

This doesn’t mean that the math is wrong , and that we have to invent religious dogma’s like quantum physics which we can never use to find the “unifying” theory.

It simply means that millions of millions of theoretical physicists and mathematicians are refusing to apply relativity too relativity.   And our limitations of words and counting things makes it very difficult to grasp that the concept of the Mandelbrot set can be applied to the concept of Mandelbrot set…   and the concept of relativity to the Mandelbrot set, and the Mandelbrot set to relativity.

Again...  I don’t care you are certain I am wrong because some theory of this one, or the experiment of that one.    It works for me , and it is the basic building block of everything in my journey of orbit around my why.

It is perfectly clear to me, and it makes perfect sense in my universe.

And the distance between my universe and your universe is a kazillionth times kazzilionth times the size of our respective universes too.  There is no conceivable way to bridge that gap, and there is no need too , because together we can act in synchronization on a larger scale...  on a larger layer which we call human interaction.

I can perfectly imagine you as a reader from a different universe has no way to comprehend this, so we need to land on a simple relationship between the two of us, and here now follows my best attempt at an incredible over simplification of what you consider to be “matter”...  but which is something that doesn’t matter to me.

Remember this little funny joke?

every wave is a composite

Well...   if the source of the vibration (which is just an orbit) is small enough...  that means the sinus wave becomes a solid object , simply because you can no longer see the empty space between the lines of the sinus wave.

“Nothing” is disturbed so fast...  that it becomes solid....   but it’s so small that it’s just the size of an Atom.   Zoom in and “nothing” is disturbed so fast that it becomes solid , but it’s so small that it’s just the size of an Electron , or a Neutron , or a Positron.

It is a planet , a sun or a moon.

It is a galaxy , or a cluster of galaxies...

...  yet it is all still nothing.

And I’ve done my absolute best to go through countless theories of experiments , and mathematical paper and my meager little stupid mind of a galaxy cannot find the flaw in this theory.

Btw...  for me (and only for me...  remember I am not calling YOU wrong...  just your method.

And we can still both be right , because it doesn’t “matter” anyways)

• This also means that the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum theory is wrong.

• This also means that the transactional interpretation of quantum theory is right. (not fun , and on it’s way “Down” , but it is the only path to get “up” again)

• This also means that Einstein was even right on subatomic scales. (Damn I love that guy)

• And it also means that the entire field of “quantum theory” is wrong, even though you can use it to describe probabilities in a chaotic system...   but that’s just endless flipping of the same coin and depending on which scale you are looking at the statistic...  the signal is either there...  or it is not.   But it is nothing anyways.
  

There is indeed no “spooky action at a distance”...  since there is no conceivable way to cross that bridge of “Scale” = “Space” ...  or a conceivable way to cross that bridge of relative time.

And yet there truly is “spooky action at a distance” ...  since everything is either in synchronization with other disturbances on the same scale and together they form a larger scale which are all influenced by the influences of the relations of the larger scale.

An iron atom on one end of a steel girder has no impact whatsoever on another atom on the other end of the same steel girder, yet when something bigger moves the steel girder, then they are all moved and when looking at both atoms at the same time as a third observer there seems to be spooky action at a distance. Everything is in infinite relation with everything in it’s scale, and the scales above, and the scales below and everything is reverberating and disturbing each other in ways and means of which we can only perceive an infinitesimally small part of.

I have let go of the concept of matter...   it truly doesn’t matter ...  and so I reject them all except the following 2 things that are orbiting each other.

Einsteins theory of energy, and Mandelbrot’s infinity.